The results of your feedback score will be displayed below
Waiting for submission of feedback...
The rubrics of this feedback scoring system are below:
Clarity of Feedback (25%)
- Good example: Your thesis statement clearly explains your argument, but your supporting evidence needs more details. For instance, include data to back up your second paragraph.
- Medium example: Your argument is decent, but you need to improve your evidence. Add more examples.
- Bad example: This is unclear. Do better next time.
Constructiveness (25%)
- Good example: To improve, try using transitional phrases between paragraphs (e.g., 'Furthermore,' or 'In contrast'). This will make your argument flow better.
- Medium example: You should improve the flow between paragraphs. Work on transitions.
- Bad example: Your writing doesn’t flow at all. Fix it.
Personalisation and Relevance (15%)
- Good example: Your unique perspective on the topic is interesting, and it shows your understanding of the subject. Building on your idea about climate change, include recent data from the IPCC report to strengthen your argument.
- Medium example: Your ideas are interesting, but they need more data. Look up recent statistics to improve.
- Bad example: You need to add data. Use more sources.
Alignment with Learning Objectives (15%)
- Good example: Your essay meets the objective of analysing the causes of deforestation, but it lacks sufficient evaluation of the economic impacts, as outlined in the assignment brief. Add a section addressing this.
- Medium example: You partially addressed the causes but didn’t fully evaluate the economic impacts.
- Bad example: You didn’t meet the objectives.
Encouragement and Emotional Impact (10%)
- Good example: Well done on presenting a clear argument! You’ve made great progress in structuring your ideas. Keep working on adding examples, and you’ll do even better.
- Medium example: Your argument is decent. You can improve by adding examples. Keep going!
- Bad example: This is not good enough. Try harder next time.
Focus on Process and Strategies (5%)
- Good example: To write a stronger conclusion, summarise your main points first, then link them to your argument. Try drafting a quick outline before you start.
- Medium example: You need to improve your conclusion. Work on summarising your main points.
- Bad example: Your conclusion is weak. Rewrite it.
Specificity (5%)
- Good example: Your second paragraph mentions 'important statistics,' but you didn’t include the actual figures. Add specific data, like the percentage of emissions caused by transport.
- Medium example: You need to add specific statistics to your paragraph.
- Bad example: This is too vague. Be more specific.